We’ve also recorded a video about this. Click here to watch on Instagram, or see below!
Last week, at President Biden’s climate summit, Canada strengthened its emission reduction target under the Paris Agreement. The new commitment is to reduce Canada’s carbon emissions by 40 per cent by 2030.
This is the third time in five months that Canada has strengthened its 2030 target, so the federal government is clearly feeling pressure. And for good reason. Even with this higher ambition, Canada is a clear laggard on climate change compared to our closest allies.
Amongst G7 nations, Canada:
- Is the only country to have increased greenhouse (GHG) emissions since the Paris Agreement was signed in 2015
- Has the weakest 2030 emission reduction target
- Has committed the least to assist developing countries in addressing the impacts of climate change
- Hands over the most to oil and gas companies in government subsidies
Canada’s climate target falls short
While greater climate ambition is welcome, Canada is still a long way from committing its fair share in terms of reducing the emissions that cause climate change. That target would be 60 per cent domestic reductions by 2030, complemented with significant investments to reduce international emissions a further 80 per cent.
The combined reductions are high because Canada, like other industrialized countries, is a rich country that has greatly benefited from centuries of burning fossil fuels and filling up the atmosphere with carbon. We need to leave a majority of the remaining carbon budget to poor, developing countries.
Environmental Defence and six other environmental organizations just published research showing that Canada can reach 60% domestic reductions, and how to get there. The research shows that these deep cuts to pollution are:
- Necessary: Canada must do its fair share to limit average global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius and avoid catastrophic climate change.
- Doable: It will be hard, but technologies and policies exist to allow Canada to achieve that higher ambition.
- Worth it: All kinds of benefits will come with much greater action: the economy continues to thrive, communities are healthier because of lower levels of air and water pollution, and household energy costs go down as we all become more energy efficient and rely on cheaper and cleaner renewable energy technologies.
New research released today shows that doubling Canada's #climate target is necessary, worth it and, most importantly, doable. Canadians are up for the work – and the benefits will be healthier communities & more, stable, green jobs. @CCDale https://t.co/7L4i4oPBmx #cdnpoli pic.twitter.com/3sAzOHyUqI
— EnvironmentalDefence (@envirodefence) April 21, 2021
We need a plan to reach our climate target
Setting climate targets is just the first, small step. More important is strong action by governments to reduce emissions by reducing our production and use of fossil fuels.
Fossil fuels are the cause of climate change. So gradually reducing our reliance on these dirty fuels is the solution. For Canada, that is primarily oil and gas, the greatest source of carbon emissions.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau rightly identified the problem in his speech at the Biden summit. The reason Canada can’t go further on climate change is because the country produces and exports a lot of oil and gas.
Unfortunately, the Prime Minister didn’t take the next step and commit to action to solve the problem—phasing out the production of all fossil fuels. The federal government has implemented many policies to reduce Canadian use of fossil fuels but has failed entirely in reducing their production.
Other jurisdictions have made this commitment. At the Biden Summit, California committed to phase out its oil and gas production. California has about the same population as Canada, and is also a major oil and gas producer. So clearly it’s doable.
View this post on Instagram
Other important and related actions
No matter what Canada’s target, we also need climate accountability to ensure that we stay on track to our climate commitments. That is possible with the introduction of a climate accountability bill in Parliament. But it needs to be so that:
- Accountability starts right away and not near the end of the decade
- Progress is regularly assessed by a panel of independent experts
- The government is required to act on the advice of those experts if Canada is off-track on emission reductions
The other crucial element is a full strategy that ensures that the economic and energy transition away from oil and gas is fair and takes care of workers and communities. Some of the most important programs would provide training for workers, economic development opportunities for communities, and early retirement for older workers.
Unifor, the union that represents many oil and gas workers has supported our call for 60 per cent reductions in domestic GHGs, but insisted that action needs to include a fair and comprehensive transition plan. This is incredible leadership from Unifor, which puts a lie to oil and gas executives and government officials who continuously talk about jobs in oil and gas and at the same time refuse to either take action on climate change or develop a fair transition strategy for workers and communities.