The end of "business as usual"

Nov
10
2011
Today’s announcement that the U.S. government is going to delay a decision on TransCanada’s proposed Keystone XL tar sands pipeline shows that business as usual has ended for the tar sands industry. While the oil industry and its allies ...

Today’s announcement that the U.S. government is going to delay a decision on TransCanada’s proposed Keystone XL tar sands pipeline shows that business as usual has ended for the tar sands industry. While the oil industry and its allies may react with shock and indignation, this should be anything but a surprise.

Over the last year and a half, several factors have lead to a disintegration of big oil’s social licence. There was the largest offshore oil spill in U.S. history when BP’s Deepwater Horizon well exploded, killing 11 workers and spewing 4.9 million barrels of oil into the ocean. In the aftermath, concerns about the oversight of the industry and its response to the spill surfaced.

Second, TransCanada's existing Keystone pipeline sprung 14 leaks in the U.S. and 21 leaks in Canada during its first year in operation. This despite claims by the company that it would “meet or exceed world-class safety and environmental standards” and leak an average of 1.4 times a decade.  Now, that very same company is seeking permission to build a bigger, more dangerous pipeline?

Third, while the tar sands industry claims that it’s well-regulated, evidence to the contrary has mounted. From scientists to the Environmental Commissioner, the absence of clear rules to protect the environment has been laid bare, repeatedly.

And fourth, with 2010 being the hottest year on record and the U.S. breaking 900 heat records last July alone, the public isn’t buying the line that more tar sands oil is good for North America. It’s clearer than ever that we can’t delay the transition beyond oil to renewable energy. Tar sands expansion takes us in the wrong direction and thousands of Canadian and American citizens are standing up for a clean energy future.

The lesson is that companies seeking to expand the infrastructure for tar sands oil, thus locking us into several decade of dependence, are going to face opposition. Keystone XL is not an isolated case – refineries wanting to retool to process tar sands like Hyperion have faced public concern and more people have registered to voice their opinion on Enbridge’s proposed Northern Gateway pipeline than any other energy project in Canadian history. As well, other jurisdictions like the European Union are calling Canada out for selling more polluting oil.

Canada can no longer credibly defend tar sands oil abroad while doing nothing at home to clamp down on pollution and transition to clean energy.

Comments

We would love to hear from you - leave a comment below, or reply to a previous comment. We have a comments policy
Environmental Defence does not endorse any of the views posted in the comments section. By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Environmental Defence has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Please note that comments are pre-moderated/reviewed and published according to our submission guidelines. Comments that use discriminatory, partisan or inappropriate language will not be published. Comments that advertise a product or service will not be published.
that you should know about.
leave a comment
Your email will NOT be shown on the website.
Enter your website, blog, Facebook or Twitter URL. It will be linked from the comment.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Nov
27
2011

Tar Sands


says:

I am 60 years old. As a little girl, I can remember my father telling me that we should be looking at running cars on something else or we will ruin the environment. I never dreamed that 50 years later, we would still be using oil and gas in such abundance. I surely hope and pray that we will break this ugly bond with fossil fuels before I leave this precious Earth...so that my grand kids will not have to face worse consequences in an effort to protect our environment.